Verizon Facing Heat For Price-Gouging Firefighters From Doing Their Work

News | Trending

Verizon Facing Heat For Price-Gouging Firefighters From Doing Their Work

Pixabay/U.S. Forest Service

As the wildfires continue to burn in California, firefighters are risking their lives to save as many people as possible. They are battling extreme heat and dangerous circumstances to try and contain the fires which have been burning for weeks, and have now covered more than 400,00 acres.

While they fight the fires, the emergency service "relies upon Internet-based systems to provide crucial and time sensitive public safety services," Fire Chief Anthony Bowden said in a new lawsuit.

But according to Bowden, Verizon interfered with their ability to do so. He claims that due to net neutrality, the provider slowed down or throttled the department's data service while they tried to coordinate their emergency response.

"The Internet has become an essential tool in providing fire and emergency response, particularly for events like large fires which require the rapid deployment and organization of thousands of personnel and hundreds of fuel engines, aircraft, and bulldozers," Bowden continued.

It wasn't until the department paid for a higher plan with more data that their service was restored.

"This throttling has had a significant impact on our ability to provide emergency services," Bowden wrote. "Verizon imposed these limitations despite being informed that throttling was actively impeding County Fire's ability to provide crisis-response and essential emergency services."

Emails were released that showed the conversation between the station and Verizon representative Silas Buss.

"Remove any data throttling ... effective immediately," Dan Farrelly, a Fire Department IT officer wrote. "Please work with us. All we need is a plan that does not offer throttling or caps of any kind."

"It's $99.99 for the first 20GB and $8/GB thereafter," Buss wrote. "To get the plan changed immediately, I would suggest calling in the plan change to our customer service team. ... Let me know if you have any questions -- I'll be available by phone for at least the next hour or so."

Outcry

The fact that emergency services were left unable to do their jobs because a provider wanted them to get a better plan didn't sit well with many people.

Verizon's Response

In an email to Mashable, Verizon said the "situation has nothing to do with net neutrality," instead calling it "a mistake in how we communicated with our customer about the terms of its plan."

Regardless of the plan emergency responders choose, we have a practice to remove data speed restrictions when contacted in emergency situations.

In this situation, we should have lifted the speed restriction when our customer reached out to us. This was a customer support mistake. We are reviewing the situation and will fix any issues going forward.

Regardless of their reasoning, it's not a great look for a company to withhold services to get more money from the fire department trying to save the state of California.

Do you think people are right for coming after Verizon for this "customer support mistake?"

[H/T: Mashable, KQED]

Meagan has an intense love for Netflix, napping, and carbs.